Update 4/10/14:  Back from a trip way down South. The posts are all back and yes, if you email me, you can use these and new docs that I am getting up.  

Have had issues with a new phone, wi-fi connections, etc. that have limited my access at times to information, discussion sites, email. 

But most everything is up now, and am committed to continue to get the real story, as documented by official word, and unbiased reporting, out there. (As for the BS...that will be shown for what it is, too).

Update #3:  Spent the morning with PPD.  A couple things on record. Learned a lot. They sent me my neighborhood guy. Went over very thoroughly what to say, constitutional r

ights, what to watch for, and what a judge would be looking for.  I have his number, and support.

Thank you for continuing to bring me slander and other more egregious excerpts of case in hand as well as suggestions from past of typical behavior that is bordering or completely stalking. 

I'm especially interested in the incredible audacity of that interstate stalker from Colorado.  She may have thought she was "effective" in some way, but she was obviously regarded with a simple "Hmmm...good-bye...let's shut the door."  Seems entirely possible that at the next "stalking" their will be many neighbors saying they have had enough. With them.

(We will have a "book" soon that will help all those having to go through this simply because someone doesn't like what you believe to be true.  More later. Will try to spend a little bit of every day on this.  Will keep you informed.)

Update #2

You guys are AWESOME! My goodness how that hate flies. I could write a book about these venom-filled characters. I'm going to pursue this to the best of my ability, (although I would rather be researching and feeling free to voice my opinion)....because:

1. If TMH is not guilty, and I and you and anyone else have a constitutional right to believe and state that, she has had a very young daughter stolen from her with LE's blessing and subjected perhaps immediately to a new mommy while daddy is busy hating on her mother, publically, and exposing her to viscous vilification through his hypocritical "sext-release".

2. All women are in danger of our constitutional rights being violated ... our right to our children, our right to speak out against those in power to take them, and our right to prosecute those who defame, stalk, threaten and harass us for our views.

Thank you for the rapid, prolific, and easily "identified" evidence.  And especially giving me legal standing that is, for right now, better than flagging those pages.  

I truly thank you from my heart. You give me courage.

UPDATE:  Got a LOT of evidence, both factual and other for my case. Thanks to all who are updating me!  Filing formal complaint with Central tomorrow.  Am getting more second-hand interstate cyber-harassment, too, as assailant is attempting to destroy direct evidence of bullying/threats. But links to others are still there, I think.  Don't need them all right now for my first steps, but any references to threats (even "One shouldn't be at a court hearing IF....") will help.  And especially if you have the page owner's name. Please send me, if possible, that picture of myself when dazed/stunned (in the hall) with a specific "shared by + assailant's name" if you have it.   And any references to my given name, threats by anyone responding in FB to assailant, fake "posters" or other threats with "suggestions" to their followers to post, etc.  Owners of pages that encourage threats to a persons' life, liberty, family, position in community, and/or job can be named, too, according to a legal advisor.

Please send evidence to:  Vwoolf.luna@comcast.net

More to come.  

Well, Here we go:  

30.866¹

Action for issuance or violation of stalking protective order

• • attorney fees

(1)A person may bring a civil action in a circuit court for a courts stalking protective order or for damages, or both, against a person if:

(a)The person intentionally, knowingly or recklessly engages in repeated and unwanted contact with the other person or a member of that persons immediate family or household thereby alarming or coercing the other person;

(b)It is objectively reasonable for a person in the victims situation to have been alarmed or coerced by the contact;and

(c)The repeated and unwanted contact causes the victim reasonable apprehension regarding the personal safety of the victim or a member of the victims immediate family or household.

(2)At the time the petition is filed, the court, upon a finding of probable cause based on the allegations in the petition, shall enter a temporary courts stalking protective order that may include, but is not limited to, all contact listed in ORS 163.730(Definitions for ORS 30.866 and 163.730 to 163.750). The petition and the temporary order shall be served upon the respondent with an order requiring the respondent to personally appear before the court to show cause why the temporary order should not be continued for an indefinite period.

(3)(a) At the hearing, whether or not the respondent appears, the court may continue the hearing for up to 30 days or may proceed to enter a courts stalking protective order and take other action as provided in ORS 163.738 (Effect of citation).

(b)If respondent fails to appear after being served as required by subsection (2) of this section, the court may issue a warrant of arrest as provided in ORS 133.110 (Issuance) in order to ensure the appearance of the respondent in court.

(4)The plaintiff may recover:

(a)Both special and general damages, including damages for emotional distress;

(b)Punitive damages; and

(c)Reasonable attorney fees and costs.

(5)The court may enter an order under this section against a minor respondent without appointment of a guardian ad litem.

(6)An action under this section must be commenced within two years of the conduct giving rise to the claim.

(7)Proof of the claim shall be by a preponderance of the evidence.

(8)The remedy provided by this section is in addition to any other remedy, civil or criminal, provided by law for the conduct giving rise to the claim.

(9)No filing fee, service fee or hearing fee shall be charged for a proceeding under this section if a courts stalking order is the only relief sought.

(10)If the respondent was provided notice and an opportunity to be heard, the court shall also include in the order, when appropriate, terms and findings sufficient under 18 U.S.C. 922 (d)(8) and (g)(8) to affect the respondents ability to possess firearms and ammunition or engage in activities involving firearms.

(11)ORS 163.741 (Service of stalking protective order) applies to protective orders issued under this section.

(12)Except for purposes of impeachment, a statement made by the respondent at a hearing under this section may not be used as evidence in a prosecution for stalking as defined in ORS 163.732(Stalking) or for violating a courts stalking protective order as defined in ORS 163.750 (Violating a courts stalking protective order). [1993 c.626 §9; 1995 c.353 §6; 1999 c.1052 §4; 2003 c.292 §3]

Note: Definitions for 30.866 (Action for issuance or violation of stalking protective order) are found in 163.730 (Definitions for ORS 30.866 and 163.730 to 163.750).