Bunch Starts Punching

Here are Peter Bunch's responses to Underhill's Support to Motion to Abate with regard to the DA intervening  in the divorce Kaine Horman initiated and fought the abatement of and then thought, when the abatement was over, oops....I might be questioned.

Not sure what the legal definition of .... motion to intervene is.
But apparently it's significant.

Chess Game: Director's Park

Highlighted..... The DA proposes to file documents which the court indicated must be served on the parties in the above-captioned proceedings.  The DA is not a party to this proceeding with limited  exceptions the Oregon  Rules of Court Procedure do not authorize an entity or person who is not a party to serve memoranda other than the  documents in a civil lawsuit.......except for motion to Intervene,

 Here is the Object to the Submissions themselves of the the Non-Party pleadings:

Bunch states (high-lighted) that The Office of the Multnomah County District Attorney (da) proposes to file documents with the court.... The DA is not a party to this proceeding....the Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure do not authorize an entity or person who is not a party to serve or file memoranda and other documents in a civil lawsuit.. In fact....except for a motion to intervene ....other than discovery impacting a non-party.....except to intervene....

High-lited;..........Wife respectfully asks the court to enter an order instructing the Clerk of the Court to reject any pleadings filed by the DA or any other person or entity who is not a party to this proceeding except for a motion to intervene.


So..."discovery impacting a non-party"..... what could that mean?

Apparently Bunch did not think this intervening by the DA would impact a non-party?


Dates.....this one filed January 31st. The previous filed January 30th.  


Both filed before Bunch's Declaration in support of Respondent's Opposition to Petitioner's Motion to Stay.


Note:  The Docket does not show an Order to the Court from Kantor.